Go Back   FITNESS . NUTRITIE . ANTRENAMENT . CULTURISM . SUPLIMENTE NUTRITIVE . SCADERE IN GREUTATE > ORICE ALTCEVA
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14-09-2010, 14:17   #1
badrhari2008
Registered User
 
badrhari2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vaslui
Posts: 248
intrebare dl neagu si ceilalti dp forum

ce parere aveti de FRANK ZANE ....triplu campion la MR. O. 1977-1979.....cred ca e printre singurii care a castigat acest concurs cu asemean "linii" parca creionate.....si nu e asa urias gen coleman si multi altii ....bn si anii 70 erau altcv fata de timpurile noastre super nu ?:P
badrhari2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-09-2010, 14:21   #2
Bello
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Otopeni
Posts: 802
Send a message via Yahoo to Bello
katalin are mai mare trapezul decat frank zane
Bello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-09-2010, 22:55   #3
badrhari2008
Registered User
 
badrhari2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vaslui
Posts: 248
:d io spuneam ca omu are niste super linii si forme chiar daca nu e masiv a fost 3x MR.O. :P
badrhari2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-09-2010, 21:23   #4
A4tech
Registered User
 
A4tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bello
katalin are mai mare trapezul decat frank zane
Dupa cum probabil nu stii, trapezul este format din mai multe zone musculare (partea superioara, partea mediana, partea inferioara si locul de insertie cu omoplatul. Intr-adevar, Zane sta mai prost pe partea superioara insa comparatia nu-si are rostul. Eu te inteleg ca-ti place sa peri, insa prostiile de genu "nu vad diferente intre arnold si ..., mai bun ca Zane" ar trebui sa le depasesti.

http://nutritiesifitness.files.wordp...us_gray409.png

@badrhari2008: In anii 70-80 culturismul era mult mai placut ochiului, chiar daca culturisti nu excelau prin masivitate (bine, mai sunt si exceptii, Sergio Oliva, Bertil Fox etc) Dupa mine anii de glorie ai culturismului. Se arbitra in special pe criterii de simetrie, echilibru, proportii si reliefare musculara. In prezent se platesc bani grei pentru monstrii masei, grupe monstru etc

Last edited by A4tech : 17-09-2010 at 21:30.
A4tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-09-2010, 21:25   #5
Bello
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Otopeni
Posts: 802
Send a message via Yahoo to Bello
Quote:
Originally Posted by A4tech
Dipa cum probabil nu stii, trapezul este format din mai multe zone musculare (partea superioara, partea mediana, partea inferioara si locul de insertie cu omoplatul. Intr-adevar, Zane sta mai prost pe partea superioara insa comparatia nu-si are rostul. Eu te inteleg ca-ti palce sa peri, insa prostii de genu "nu vad diferente intre arnold si ..., mai bun ca Zane" ar trebui sa le depasesti.

http://nutritiesifitness.files.wordp...us_gray409.png
a fost o gluma.
Bello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-09-2010, 21:36   #6
A4tech
Registered User
 
A4tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 694
http://www.legendaryfitness.com/GodsofSymmetry.htm

Aruncati un ochi mai sus, adevarate sculpturi umane, cat echilibru intre grupe. Si Shawn Ray putea sa fie inclus, ma mir ca a a fost omis.
A4tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +3. The time now is 04:57.